Jack Nicklaus and Tiger Woods stipulate that the most important component for your golf swing is “speed” (club throne speed). They both stipulate that you need to learn swing speed first and verism will come later. Without speed you can’t generate increasingly distance. Without long suburbanite loftiness you will never reach anywhere near the 300 yards that you want, to get closer to the green, for easier short tideway shots.
Control Is the Second Most Important Component
Jack and Tiger felt that direction tenancy was less important than distance. All golfers can sooner learn to make setup welding to tenancy their yank or fade to modernize their percentage of fairways hit in regulation. Tiger was not worried well-nigh missing fairways with his longer suburbanite distance. His skill to hit increasingly Greens in Regulation proved that he could recover from difficult locations and still land his wittiness in unconfined putting locations.
Overall Tiger’s had a worse percentage of hitting Fairways In Regulation than his Greens In Regulation. That ways that his worthiness to recover or scramble from off the fairway was the weightier part of his game. This make sense when you see his backyard. He has 3, par-3 holes and can practice whenever he had spare time. Way to go Tiger!
I have never been a big fan of swinging faster but I do realize that a faster club throne speed is the only way to proceeds distance. I’m getting when on the bandwagon, but I will definitely focus on hitting increasingly fairways with a stronger release. Of undertow I still practice with GOLFSTR to alimony my leading arm straight in the backswing. Setting up with my leading elbow pointing up my target line AND KEEPING MY LEADING ARM STRAIGHT are both real success factors for my improved game. My goal is to shoot every round in the 80’s or better. Buy one today at www.GOLFSTR.com
Golf opinions researched by GOLF blog: 3. “The cart fee should be shared with your riding partner.” What do YOU think?
First thing to say in this debate is that it’s very difficult to make comparisons between two players in any sport when they have competed in different eras. We will never know for sure who would have triumphed had Tiger Woods being playing to the peak of his powers against Jack Nicklaus in the 1960s and 70s, or if Jack had faced up to Tiger when playing his best stuff in the late 1990s or 2000s.
Second thing to note is that, because the stats on all aspects of the game that have been kept during Tiger’s playing career are significantly more extensive and wide-ranging than the numbers we have for Jack’s career, it’s difficult, if not impossible, to make direct comparisons between their numbers, in terms of strokes gained or percentage of putts holed, for example.
Then, you have to take technology into account – Tiger has used equipment that offers greater advantage than what was on offer to Jack 50 years ago, so the younger man has been able to hit the ball further, spin the ball more consistently, putt on smoother surfaces, play from crisper lies.
